This is a satisfyingly simple story. It is also a profoundly shallow, and ultimately incorrect, diagnosis.

To understand what is truly happening in Poland, we need to discard the simplistic headlines and adopt two powerful, unconventional lenses. The first is the darkly realist worldview of Curtis Yarvin, the Silicon Valley blogger better known as Mencius Moldbug, who diagnosed the hidden power structure of the modern West. The second is the cold, formal logic of Docent Józef Kosecki, a brilliant Cold War-era Polish scientist who applied the universal principles of cybernetics to the brutal realities of social control.

When combined, these frameworks reveal that the struggle for Poland is not a mere political squabble. It is a technical, systemic conflict for control. It is a cybernetic war between an autonomous national system trying to preserve its integrity and a dominant, suprasupranational super-system intent on total assimilation. And for Poland, this is not a new war; it is merely a new front.

Our Guides to the Machine

Before we dive in, we must understand our guides.

Curtis Yarvin is the intellectual godfather of the neoreactionary movement. From his blog Unqualified Reservations, he articulated a devastating critique of modern liberal democracy. His central thesis is that real power in the West does not reside with elected officials. Instead, it lies with “The Cathedral”—a decentralized but ideologically synchronized network of the nation’s most powerful institutions: its elite universities, its prestige media, its vast civil service, and its web of powerful foundations and NGOs. The Cathedral, Yarvin argues, is the true government. It does not need to conspire; its members, educated in the same institutions, instinctively work in concert to create and enforce a progressive orthodoxy.

Docent Józef Kosecki was a Polish scientist and student of Marian Mazur, the father of Polish cybernetics. Living under the thumb of the Soviet Union, Kosecki became obsessed with understanding the mechanics of power in a purely formal, scientific way. For Kosecki, any society is a “Social Control System” (SSS). Like any control system, it has a decision-making center (government), an information subsystem (culture, media), and an energy subsystem (economy, military). The ultimate goal of a healthy, autonomous SSS is to pursue its own goals. Kosecki gave this quality a crucial name: sterowność—the capacity for self-steering. A system without sterowność is not a system at all; it is merely an object being controlled by another.

The Rosetta Stone: The Cathedral is a Social Control System

The genius of this combined approach is how perfectly these two worldviews map onto one another.

• Yarvin’s Cathedral is simply Kosecki’s dominant, supranational Social Control System.

• The progressive ideology is the normative software of the Cathedral—an operating system it seeks to install in every subordinate system.

• A sovereign nation-state, like Poland, is an autonomous SSS running its own historically-evolved, “legacy” software.

The conflict becomes brutally clear: it is a battle over whether Poland will continue to run its own code or have its operating system overwritten by the Cathedral.

1. The “Rule of Law” Conflict is a Cybernetic Steering War

The endless dispute with Brussels over the Polish judiciary is the most obvious front in this war. In the cybernetic-Yarvinist frame, it’s about something concrete: control over the national decision-making center. The Cathedral (via its EU institutions) sends powerful “steering signals”—court rulings, threats of withholding funds. The goal is to establish an unbreakable precedent: that the external signal from the supranational system always overrides the internal signal from the national democratic process. When a government in Warsaw complies, it proves it has been downgraded to a przedmiot sterowany (a steered object).

2. The “Polish-Polish War” is an Internal Information Attack

The bitter internal polarization is a direct consequence of the Cathedral’s successful infiltration of the Polish information subsystem. Large portions of Poland’s media, academia, and NGO ecosystem act as local receptors for the Cathedral’s normative software. Their primary loyalty is not to the Polish SSS, but to the supranational one. Kosecki called this an “information parasite,” an element crippling the host’s ability to act coherently by forcing it to expend massive energy fighting itself.

3. The Culture War is a Battle for the System’s Source Code

The visceral fights over LGBT rights, abortion, and the role of the Church are the deepest layer of this conflict. This is a battle over the fundamental operating code of the nation. The traditional values derived from Poland’s history constitute its “general norms”—the source code defining its goals. The progressive norms pushed by the Cathedral are a “malicious software update” designed to overwrite this code with a new, universal set of instructions. This is Yarvin’s “missionary” impulse in action—the drive to remake every society in its own image.

A Familiar Echo: The PRL as a Steered System

For Poles, this dynamic of external steering is not a theoretical abstraction; it is a deeply ingrained historical memory. The Polish People’s Republic (PRL) period from 1945-1989 was a case study in being a steered object.

Applying the same cybernetic model:

• The External SSS: The Soviet Union.

• The Normative Software: Marxism-Leninism.

• The Steering Method: Unlike the Cathedral’s soft power, the Soviet method was a mix of hard and crude power. The Polish decision-making center (the PZPR party) was formally in charge, but key decisions were dictated by the Kremlin. The information subsystem (state media, censorship) relentlessly broadcast the Marxist-Leninist software. The energy subsystem was controlled through economic dependency (COMECON) and the ultimate backstop: the physical presence of the Red Army.

Yet, the assimilation was never total. The “Polish legacy code” proved incredibly resilient. The Catholic Church functioned as a powerful, independent information subsystem, broadcasting an alternative set of norms. The nation’s memory of independence acted as a cultural firewall. The Solidarity movement was the ultimate expression of the national SSS attempting to re-establish its own sterowność by building a parallel, autonomous information and decision network. This experience makes the Polish system acutely sensitive to the mechanics of external control. The methods of the Western Cathedral are more subtle—financial incentives instead of tanks—but for a system with deep scar tissue, the pressure to conform feels eerily familiar.

The Future Front: A War Between Two Cathedrals?

The unipolar dominance of the Western Cathedral is being challenged. For Poland, this does not mean a return to true autonomy, but the prospect of being caught between two competing external Social Control Systems. If Russia were to regain hegemonic power, it would attempt to install a new operating system.

• The Western Cathedral steers with the soft power of ideological seduction and financial integration. Its software is progressive universalism.

• The Eastern Cathedral (the Kremlin’s power bloc) would steer with the crude power of energy blackmail and military intimidation. Its software is a cynical blend of Russian nationalism, Orthodox traditionalism, and anti-Western resentment.

The future conflict might not be a choice between freedom and tyranny, but between two different models of external control.

The Bartosiak Gambit: A Path to Autonomy in a World of Giants

If Poland is a system under siege, how can it regain its sterowność? The answer may lie in the work of Polish geostrategic thinkers like Jacek Bartosiak and his Strategy & Future (S&F) think tank. Their analysis, born from the hard school of military logic and geopolitics, provides a pragmatic—if challenging—roadmap for a nation-state to achieve autonomy in an age of empires.

The S&F diagnosis is perfectly aligned with the cybernetic model. They argue that the emerging world order is a systemic conflict between the US and China, with Europe (and Poland) being treated as a mere “terrain of operations” or a set of proxies to be sacrificed. The US, acting like an empire, disciplines its allies to maintain control of its own “backyard” in its fight with China. This is the logic of a dominant SSS ensuring its vassals remain compliant. The core problem, as S&F identifies, is that Poland has hardware (tanks, planes) but lacks the sovereign “software of war”—its Command & Control (C2), intelligence, and situational awareness are almost entirely dependent on the US. It is a steered object by technical design.

The Bartosiak Gambit is a multi-layered strategy to break free from this condition:

1. Achieve C2 Sovereignty: Seize the “Software of War.”
The S&F mantra, “Who sees faster, understands, strikes, wins,” is a purely cybernetic statement. The first step towards autonomy is building a sovereign information subsystem for national defense. This means investing massively in national satellite constellations, reconnaissance drones, signals intelligence, and integrated command systems. Without its own eyes, ears, and brain, Poland’s military body, no matter how muscular, will always be a puppet on American strings. This is the technical precondition for sterowność.

2. Embrace the “Intermarium” as a Balancing Mechanism.
In a world dominated by the US-China rivalry, a medium-sized state like Poland is too small to act alone. The S&F solution is to create a regional bloc of states—the Intermarium or Three Seas Initiative—that can act as a cohesive system. This bloc would not be anti-US or anti-EU, but pro-itself. Its purpose is to create its own center of gravity, making it a valuable but independent partner, rather than a dependent proxy. By pooling its economic and military potential, this regional SSS could gain the mass necessary to balance between the larger powers, negotiating terms instead of merely accepting them.

3. Break the Mental Taboos: A Psychological Reboot.
S&F’s most profound contribution is its assault on the “internalized helplessness” of the Polish elite. As their discussions reveal, there is a deep-seated belief that it is improper or “crazy” for Poland to discuss certain tools of sovereignty, such as nuclear proliferation or a fundamental re-evaluation of alliances. This is the ghost of the PRL—the mental software of a steered object that has outlived the system that installed it. The Bartosiak Gambit requires an intellectual shock: forcing an open, pragmatic debate about every available tool of power. It is about fostering a mindset that sees Poland as a sovereign actor—a podmiot sterujący—that uses alliances as tools, not as a replacement for its own strength and will.

4. Leverage Geopolitical Position: From Shatterzone to Pivot State.
Poland’s location between Germany and Russia has historically been a curse. In the new era of US-China competition, it can become a source of immense leverage. A strong, independent Poland is valuable to the US as a bulwark against Russia. It is valuable to China as a stable gateway to Europe for its Belt and Road Initiative. It is valuable to Germany as a strategic buffer and economic partner. A Polish state with true sterowność would not pledge loyalty to one side but would skillfully play these interests against each other, extracting concessions and carving out space for its own autonomy in exchange for providing stability in a critical region.

Conclusion: Writing a New Code

Viewing Poland through this combined lens reveals the stark reality of its position. It is a system under siege from without and within, fighting a multi-generational, multi-front war for its right to self-steer—first against the East, and now against the West’s subtle but pervasive control.

The solutions offered by the Strategy & Future school are not easy. They require immense political will, vast resources, and a radical shift in the national mindset. But they represent the only viable path away from being a pawn in someone else’s great game.

The central question facing Poland today is not about which political party is in power.
It is the fundamental, cybernetic question that has defined its entire history: Is the Polish Social Control System an autonomous subject, capable of defining and pursuing its own destiny? Or is it a passive object, a program being run by a more powerful, external machine whose goals are not its own?

The struggle is not over who sits in the government buildings in Warsaw. It is over who gets to write the code that runs Poland itself.

Picture this: The European Union stands at a crossroads. Economic undercurrents tug at each member state, while political tensions mount over a fundamental question: Who will lead this vast, diverse bloc? Many Europeans are wary of German leadership—given the historical weight and economic power that Germany wields—yet Berlin itself is reluctant to give up any position or influence it has gained.

The result? A collective impasse. Rival national interests stall necessary reforms, hamper decisive action, and leave citizens across the EU increasingly frustrated. Amid inflation spikes, climate stress, and rising inequality, Europe’s unity feels fragile. Historians often point out how profound crises—like revolutions—tend to erupt when large segments of society feel unrepresented or cornered. If the EU can’t find a shared leadership model soon, a political rupture on the scale of a “European revolution” becomes more plausible than many would like to admit.

Inequality Under the Surface: The Role of the Gini Coefficient

Economic inequality, though lower in the EU (with a Gini coefficient of around 0.29 in 2023) compared to historical revolutionary thresholds—for instance, estimates of 0.59 in pre-1789 France—still festers beneath the surface.

What is the Gini Coefficient?
It’s a common measure of income inequality, ranging from 0 (perfect equality) to 1 (complete inequality). A rise toward or beyond 0.4 often correlates with increased social unrest, as frustrations over wealth gaps can amplify political discontent.

Add in rising costs of living, climate policy tensions, and migration debates, and you’ve got a recipe for discontent. Research suggests that once inequality drifts near or beyond 0.4, social unrest risks spike—especially if trust in institutions is eroding. With EU trust hovering at 49% and varying wildly by country (69% in Denmark vs. majority mistrust in places like France), the cracks are showing.

When Might the Tipping Point Arrive?

Revolutions don’t come with a calendar invite, but history offers clues. The French Revolution erupted when extreme inequality met a fiscal crisis; the Arab Spring ignited when moderate Gini levels (0.30–0.40) collided with youth unemployment and corruption. Today’s EU isn’t at those extremes—yet. Bulgaria’s Gini sits at 0.37, Latvia’s at 0.34, and protests like the 2023–2024 farmers’ marches are loud but localized.

A perfect storm brews as Russia, the US, and China tilt the scales:

• Russia’s Shadow: Moscow’s war in Ukraine, bolstered by Chinese tech and trade, keeps Europe on edge. If Russia wins—or Trump cuts a deal sidelining Kyiv—Putin’s emboldened hand could destabilize Eastern Europe, spiking fear and unrest.

• US Wildcard: Trump’s return signals a NATO pullback. His tariffs and coziness with Putin threaten Europe’s security blanket. If the US abandons Ukraine or strong-arms allies, trust in Western cohesion could collapse.

• China’s Leverage: Beijing props up Russia with dual-use goods—drones, chips, optics—while eyeing Europe as a trade buffer against US pressure. If China floods the EU with exports or sways reconstruction in Ukraine, economic dependence could deepen, splitting EU unity.

Research on social change pegs the tipping point at around 25% of a population demanding reform. If a quarter of Europe’s 450 million citizens—some 112 million people—feel economically squeezed and politically unheard, the pressure could force a reckoning. That might not mean guillotines in Brussels, but it could spark a radical rethinking of how the EU governs itself.

The Key Hurdle: Democratic Legitimacy and Brussels Bureaucracy

Ursula von der Leyen, the current European Commission President, faces questions of democratic legitimacy—not because her appointment violated EU rules, but rather because those rules themselves reflect a deeper democratic deficit. Von der Leyen was chosen not through direct election by European voters but indirectly via political negotiations behind closed doors, later confirmed by the European Parliament. Many Europeans feel alienated by this distant and opaque process, fueling perceptions that the EU institutions reflect elite interests rather than citizen preferences.

The Solution: A Bottom-Up, Open-Source Revolution

Top-down fixes won’t cut it. The elite shuffle—swapping one technocrat for another—only fuels the circus of power politics. Instead, imagine a revolution from the ground up, powered by technology and transparency. Enter the European Operating System (EU-OS): an open-source, digital governance platform that redefines leadership not as a person or nation, but as a system anyone can plug into, like a pen drive into a laptop.

Here’s the vision:

• CitizenOS: Secure digital IDs let every European vote, propose ideas, or track spending via mobile apps—think Estonia’s e-governance on steroids, scaled for 27 nations.

• EU-DecisionCore: AI crunches big data—economic trends, climate stats, social sentiment—to simulate policy impacts, offering lawmakers and citizens alike clear, evidence-based options.

• OpenGov EU: Transparent dashboards show where every euro goes, with blockchain ensuring no one can fudge the numbers.

This isn’t sci-fi—it’s a practical leap. Estonia’s X-Road already links government databases seamlessly; Switzerland’s direct democracy proves citizens can steer policy; Taiwan’s vTaiwan shows digital consensus-building works. The EU could pilot this in a few countries—say, Finland and Bulgaria—then scale it up, using existing tools like the European Digital Identity Wallet (set for 2025–2026 rollout).

Why It Works

1. It sidesteps the leadership quagmire. No single nation “leads”—the system does, guided by collective input. Germany’s influence becomes just one voice among many, balanced by data-driven equity measures that uplift lagging regions.

2. It tackles inequality head-on. Big data can pinpoint where wealth concentrates (e.g., London vs. rural Romania) and suggest targeted fixes—think Scandinavia’s progressive taxation meets AI optimization.

3. It rebuilds trust. When citizens see their votes and taxes in action, the 49% trust figure could climb, staving off unrest.

Globally, this positions the EU as a governance innovator. While China’s AI-driven control sacrifices freedom and the U.S. wrestles with polarization, the EU could export a model that’s efficient, equitable, and democratic—think of it as GDPR for governance, a standard others emulate.

Is a Revolution Inevitable—or a Call to Action?

Let’s be clear: “revolution” needn’t mean chaos. Sometimes, it’s a dramatic reimagining of how society governs itself. Should the EU remain stuck in top-down inertia, yes, widespread unrest or radical shifts could happen. But if we seize this moment—building an open, bottom-up governance system that harnesses digital innovation—Europe can transition into a new era of unity and shared prosperity.

Key Steps Forward

1. Initiate Digital Pilots: Launch small-scale open-source governance pilots in volunteer regions, demonstrating how policy collaboration and transparent fund-tracking can work.

2. Incorporate Citizen Dashboards: Give real-time, user-friendly insight into budgets, proposals, and progress—breaking the bureaucracy bubble.

3. Establish a Pan-EU Governance Standard: Encourage each member state to adopt open data and open-source modules, ensuring interoperability without losing local nuances.

4. Promote Education and Engagement: Provide training so average citizens (not just tech experts) can easily navigate and shape the system, guaranteeing broad adoption.

By taking these steps, the EU can meet its longstanding ideals of cooperation, democracy, and social justice—while sidestepping the destructive potential of a leadership crisis or power vacuum.

The Future Awaits

We stand on the verge of a profound shift in European history. No single nation can (or should) take the helm. Instead, the EU must forge a path that harnesses human creativity, local input, and advanced digital tools to achieve meaningful, transparent governance.

The European revolution isn’t inevitable, but its seeds are sown. Without change, we risk a repeat of history—fragmentation, unrest, or worse. With EU-OS, we can rewrite the script: a union not led by Berlin or Brussels, but by 450 million voices, harmonized through code and data. The circus ends when we stop watching the clowns and start building the stage ourselves.

Will we seize this moment? Or will we allow old grudges and rigid hierarchies to push us toward upheaval? The choice, as always, belongs to us—and the digital platforms we decide to create and champion.

Greetings from the Future—let’s make it one worth arriving at.

The reality is that Europe's trajectory is not optimistic unless transformative actions are taken. Deregulation to spur innovation, ramping up investments in emerging technologies, and overhauling education to emphasize creativity and critical thinking could help shift Europe's prospects. But such systemic changes require time that the continent may not have as new global powers rise.  

Europe's historical ascendancy was built on the prowess of colonial expansion and scientific breakthroughs like the Industrial Revolution. However, the era of decolonization and the emergence of economic juggernauts in Asia have diminished Europe's relative standing. Internal pressures like political fragmentation and immigrant integration compound the challenges of maintaining a united economic and geopolitical stance.

Empowering Communities Through Self-Sufficiency in Food Production

In the near-term, building resilience is imperative for weathering potential tough times ahead and maintaining social stability. This means reducing reliance on the state by empowering citizens and communities. A pragmatic example: facilitating widespread urban and rural agriculture to boost food self-sufficiency and provide a constructive outlet for the population.

Cultivating food not only meets a basic need but also provides a sense of purpose and achievement. The physical and mental engagement required in gardening and farming activities can have therapeutic effects, promoting mental health and fostering a connection with the land. When communities come together to create gardens and share in the cultivation and harvest of produce, it strengthens social bonds and creates a fabric of support and mutual assistance. Keeping citizens productively occupied can deter social unrest driven by economic anxiety.

In the quest for resilience and self-sufficiency, an often-overlooked outcome is the profound sense of safety and security it brings to citizens. The ability to produce one's food and rely on local, community-driven support systems not only mitigates the vulnerability to global supply chain disruptions but also reinforces a collective confidence among community members. This sense of security is foundational, extending beyond the physical to the psychological, fostering a sense of belonging and community solidarity. As Europe faces uncertain times, ensuring citizens feel safe and protected in their communities by promoting self-reliance initiatives becomes not just a matter of practicality but a cornerstone of social stability.

Localized Agricultural Education

Initiatives that provide training on localized agricultural methods, tailored to the climates and topographies of Europe's diverse regions, could enable widespread food self-sufficiency. Rather than standardized mass instruction, contextualized lessons on cultivating crops best-suited to each area's microenvironment would optimize outputs and custodian natural resources effectively. In the sun-drenched Mediterranean, households might foster drought-tolerant olive groves and vegetable patches, while those in the temperate LOW Countries could nurture fertile fields of grains and potatoes.

The Permaculture Paradigm

Moreover, incorporating the principles of permaculture - designing agricultural ecosystems modeled on patterns and relationships found in nature - can secure myriad environmental, economic, and social benefits. Permaculture enhances soil health through sustainable practices like companion planting and crop rotation, improving long-term yields. It reduces reliance on resource-intensive industrial farming inputs while mitigating climate impacts. And it fosters community engagement by empowering citizens to share land, labor, and the fruits of their toil.

Overcoming Obstacles to Equitable Implementation

While concepts like localized agricultural training, urban gardening, and permaculture hold immense promise, implementing them across Europe's diverse communities is not without challenges. Land access and affordability pose barriers in dense cities, where open spaces are limited and real estate is expensive. Rural and lower-income areas may lack funding and resources to build out the necessary educational programming and infrastructure.

Careful urban planning that creatively utilizes rooftops, vacant lots, and repurposes underutilized spaces can help circumvent land scarcity. But developing these urban agricultural zones equitably is key - avoiding green gentrification that prices out underserved communities. Public-private partnerships must prioritize democratizing access and locating community gardens in disadvantaged neighborhoods.

Social Inclusion and Equity

Beyond ensuring fair access, a shift towards decentralized food production should empower social inclusion and equitable involvement. Urban gardening can integrate refugee, disability, and other underrepresented communities, creating economic opportunities and connective community experiences. Youth engagement programs can nurture generational interest in sustainable agriculture while developing entrepreneurial skills.

Within rural areas, collective permaculture projects can bring together diverse demographic groups, bridging cultural divides through shared partnership and community-building. 

An equitable approach should extend through the entire sustainable food value chain as well. Prioritizing procurement from minority-owned businesses, cooperatives and Local small-holder operations when sourcing seeds, tools and other inputs can drive economic empowerment.

While the resilience dividends of localized agriculture may start at the household level, the full societal benefits can only be realized through participatory, inclusive processes. Achieving food self-sufficiency is not just about volume outputs, but cultivating connected communities across Europe with a stakeholding in sustainable self-determination.

The Innovation Imperative

Unlocking that innovation through deregulation, targeted investments, and revamped education will remain Europe's paramount long-term objective. The continent has a rich legacy as a wellspring of transformative ideas and technological breakthroughs to build upon. But staying ahead of the innovation curve in an increasingly competitive global landscape will require a concerted, strategic commitment.

However, modern global competition is fiercer than ever before. Economic juggernauts like China, India, and resurgent technological powers like Japan and South Korea are aggressively propelling public and private initiatives in cutting-edge domains like artificial intelligence, renewable energy systems, quantum computing, and more. Maintaining an innovation edge requires Europe to streamline regulatory regimes that could be stifling new ideas, and enact sweeping structural reforms to incentivize and protect R&D investment across sectors.

Complementing an innovation-friendly business climate, Europe must double down on human capital development through comprehensive education overhauls. Curricula should embolden critical thinking, problem-solving skills, and entrepreneurial mindsets from an early age through adulthood. Interdisciplinary study combining STEM, humanities, and entrepreneurship creates Renaissance thinkers able to catalyze conceptual leaps. Tertiary institutions should deepen public-private research partnerships to rapidly translate discoveries into practical applications and new ventures.

Far from resting on its laurels, Europe has an opportunity to undergo a transformative reinvention – one that fully harnesses the reservoir of ingenuity across its highly skilled and educated population. Major public initiatives like the European Commission's Horizon Europe program, which pledges €95.5 billion toward catalyzing ground-breaking research and innovations, are critical for signaling long-term commitment and providing catalytic capital. However, success hinges on steady, strategic implementation that nimble pivots in response to emerging needs and opportunities.

A Crossroads of Adaptation and Ingenuity

Europe stands at a crossroads between reversible decline and revitalization through resilience and ingenuity. Difficult paths lie ahead, but with pragmatic steps to empower self-sufficiency, occupy populations productively, and an unwavering focus on the future of innovation, Europe can write its next chapter as a united force for progress.

Moreover, as Europe embraces resilience and innovation, one of the unintended yet potentially transformative outcomes could be the deurbanization of cities and a growing trend towards moving to the countryside. The emphasis on local agriculture, self-sufficiency, and community empowerment might make rural living more appealing, offering a quality of life unattainable in dense urban centers. This shift could alleviate urban pressures while revitalizing rural areas, redistributing populations in a way that supports sustainable development across the continent. As people seek more meaningful connections with their food sources and communities, the countryside offers a canvas for the kind of sustainable, interconnected living that future generations might aspire to, marking a return to the land that underpins Europe's resilience.

A Clarion Call for Pilot Programs

The path forward for a resilient, revitalized Europe is clear - but it will require concrete action and an unwavering commitment to realizing this vision. Tangible steps must be taken to initiate pilot programs that empower communities to achieve sustainable food self-sufficiency through localized agricultural training, urban gardening, permaculture design, and equitable supply chains.

I call on European Union institutions, national governments, municipalities, NGOs, universities, and private sector partners to unite in a grand collaboration. Identify locations prime for launching these pilot efforts - from densely populated city districts to rural heartlands. Dedicate resources and funding for comprehensive agricultural outreach, education, and infrastructure. Prioritize inclusive processes that bring all community voices to the table in program development.

This is not a short-term project, but a multi-year societal reinvention demanding patience, determination, and resolve. 

The time to plant the seeds for Europe's resilient and sustainable future is now. This reenvisioning will not be easy, but by turning our shovels, sowing the soil, and nurturing collective commitment, we can till fertile ground for generations' prosperity and progress. The opportunity to shape this new Europe - rooted in its arable lands yet branching ambitiously into the future of innovation - is ripe. Who will seize the mantle of pioneering change?

Let the pilot lights burn bright as beacons of European resolve and fortitude. The renascence of empowered self-sufficiency, purpose, and social cohesion can begin today. A revitalized Europe, balancing sustainable self-determination with ingenuity, awaits. The future's harvest will be bountiful for all who till its soils now.

The Well-Being Index (WBI) introduces a groundbreaking approach to societal measurement, aiming to be a global 'North Star' beyond GDP. It leverages live data for real-time insights across all scales of society, from local communities to global levels. Distinctively, the WBI combines AI alignment with human-centric goals and gamification, encouraging active participation in societal well-being. This innovation marks a shift toward a sustainable and equitable future, where progress is measured by the comprehensive health and balance of society and the environment. The WBI embodies a holistic view of progress, capturing the dynamic interplay of economic, social, and environmental factors. From today's vantage point, we underscore the integration of quantifiable indicators such as housing affordability, unemployment rates, air quality, access to fresh water, chronic disease ratios, mental health prevalence, green space per inhabitant, and life expectancy. These indicators are essential for painting a detailed picture of societal well-being. Focusing on these metrics and advocating for open access to live data through regulatory changes, the WBI seeks to provide a nuanced, real-time reflection of societal health. This objective and dynamic measure of well-being highlights the necessity of a transparent, inclusive approach to measuring societal progress that aligns with the complexities of contemporary life.

WBI white paper

124KB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download the full WBI white paper

Download

Navigating the Complexity of Modern Society with the WBI

The fundamental challenge in our current approach to measuring societal progress lies in the limitations of traditional metrics like GDP. These metrics often fail to capture the intricate complexities and nuances of modern life, and their focus on economic growth can obscure critical issues such as resource depletion, environmental impact, and social inequalities. As we move into an era marked by rapid advancements in AI and robotics, the disconnect between economic metrics and the multifaceted nature of societal well-being becomes increasingly apparent.

In response to this growing dissonance, and amidst an environment of fluctuating economic indicators like high interest rates and stagnating GDP growth, the Well-Being Index (WBI) emerges as a much-needed new compass, a ‘North Star’. The current absence of a unified global Key Performance Indicator (KPI) leads to misaligned efforts in addressing world challenges.

At the forefront of the WBI project is an ambition to shift from traditional metrics like Gross Domestic Product (GDP) to a more holistic, encompassing measure of societal health. Integrating real-time data on diverse aspects such as housing affordability, employment conditions, mental well-being, and environmental sustainability, the WBI aims to provide a multifaceted view of our collective prosperity, spanning local to global scales.

In a transformative shift from traditional economic competition, imagine a world where nations strive to outdo each other based on the Well-Being Index (WBI) rather than mere GDP growth. This paradigm shift would foster a collaborative form of competition, where the success of one nation in enhancing its societal well-being becomes a catalyst for others to follow. Countries would be incentivized to share best practices, learn from each other’s successes and challenges, and even support each other’s growth in well-being metrics. This is not just competition but cooperative progression, where the triumph of one country in achieving higher WBI scores propels others towards similar achievements. Such a global focus on the WBI rather than GDP would create an international environment where the pursuit of well-being becomes a collective endeavor, benefiting all nations and their citizens. It’s a competition where every participant’s growth contributes to a global rise in quality of life, environmental sustainability, and social equity – a true win-win scenario for the global community

In this era of technological innovation and environmental consciousness, the WBI stands as a beacon of a new paradigm. It offers a metric deeply attuned to the realities of our time — a metric that equally values human well-being, planetary health, and economic prosperity. This shift represents a move towards a more sustainable and equitable model of progress, where the advancement of society does not come at the expense of our natural world or the fabric of our communities but is harmoniously integrated with the overall health of our planet and its inhabitants.

Revolutionizing Societal Health Metrics with Live Data in the WBI

While traditional metrics like the Human Development Index (HDI), Gross National Happiness (GNH), Happy Planet Index (HPI), and Social Progress Index (SPI) have provided valuable insights, they face significant limitations in engagement and responsiveness due to their reliance on static data. This static nature often fails to capture the rapidly evolving social and economic landscape. Furthermore, critical data, especially in sensitive areas such as anonymized health information, is not readily available under current policy frameworks, limiting these indices' potential for real-time impact.

The Well-Being Index (WBI) addresses these challenges by pioneering the use of live data, enabling real-time feedback on the social and economic pulse from the micro-level of municipalities and districts to the macro-level of cities, regions, and nations. This innovative approach transforms the WBI into an interactive and responsive measure of societal health, engaging individuals and communities not just as observers but as active participants in shaping the index. By ensuring access to dynamic, relevant data, while advocating for policy changes that allow ethical data utilization, the WBI is set to offer a more accurate, comprehensive, and live reflection of our communities, capturing the nuances of contemporary life. To serve as a new North Star in societal health metrics, guiding our decisions and policies with an unprecedented level of accuracy and responsiveness.

Integrating Objective Measures into the Well-Being Index

From today's standpoint, the necessity to refine our approach to measuring societal progress is underscored by the evolving global landscape, marked by pressing environmental concerns, shifting economic dynamics, and the complex web of social challenges. In envisioning the future of the Well-Being Index (WBI), we emphasize the integration of quantifiable indicators that reflect the intricacies of modern life. These include the ratio of average or median wage to housing affordability, measured by the square meter cost or rent, which provides insight into economic accessibility and living standards. Similarly, the unemployment rate serves as a critical economic health barometer, while air quality and access to fresh water highlight environmental sustainability and public health priorities. Chronic disease ratios and the percentage of the population grappling with mental health issues offer a window into the healthcare system's effectiveness and societal well-being. Additionally, the quantification of green space per inhabitant and life expectancy rates are indispensable in assessing the quality of life and environmental integration within communities.

By focusing on these measurable indicators and advocating for the open access of live data through regulatory changes, the WBI aims to offer a nuanced, real-time reflection of societal health. This objective approach not only facilitates a deeper understanding of our collective well-being but also propels us toward actionable insights and policy-making that prioritize human and environmental health. In this context, the WBI transcends traditional metrics, advocating for a dynamic, inclusive, and transparent measure of progress that resonates with the complexities of the 21st century.

Gamification: Encouraging Individual and Collective Participation

The WBI introduces the concept of gamification into the realm of societal well-being. By creating a system where individuals and communities are motivated to improve their well-being scores, we embed an element of interaction and reward into the pursuit of societal health. This gamification aspect aims to foster a sense of community and collective responsibility, making the process of societal improvement both engaging and enjoyable.

Recognizing the unique position and potential of Gen-Z – digital natives who are interconnected, environmentally conscious, and invested in individual well-being - the WBI project seeks to leverage their perspectives and energy.

Empowering Local Communities for Wider Impact

The WBI is designed to not only measure but also to empower. By providing targeted support and insights into neighboring areas, we can create a ripple effect of improvement. The premise is simple yet impactful: enhancing the well-being of surrounding areas contributes to our collective prosperity. The WBI encourages looking beyond our immediate vicinity to foster regional and global well-being.

AI Alignment: Harmonizing Humanity and AI for Societal Well-being

In a world increasingly driven by the AI revolution, the quest for alignment between humans and artificial intelligence is a pressing and complex challenge. A thought-provoking perspective to consider is that the key to achieving this alignment may lie in first attaining harmony within humanity itself. By ensuring that the Well-Being Index (WBI) is finely tuned to human objectives and ethical principles, we aim to create a synergy where AI not only processes and analyzes data for efficiency but also embodies our collective aspirations for global well-being. This approach to integrating AI into the WBI seeks to mirror our shared values and goals, reflecting a concerted effort to align technological advancements with the nuanced tapestry of human society.

The WBI and Capitalism: Paving the Way for Economic Transformation

In the prevailing capitalist model, where GDP often serves as the primary benchmark for economic health and policy decisions, the introduction of the Well-Being Index (WBI) presents a revolutionary shift. By aligning WBI metrics with local taxation systems, we can recalibrate capitalist incentives to prioritize societal well-being alongside economic growth. For instance, regions demonstrating higher WBI scores could benefit from tax incentives or resource allocations, encouraging local governments and businesses to invest more in community well-being, environmental sustainability, and equitable growth. This approach not only harmonizes capitalist dynamics with broader societal goals but also lays the groundwork for a gradual transition towards a resource-based economy. In such an economy, the allocation and utilization of resources would be directly tied to enhancing overall societal well-being, as measured by the WBI, rather than merely maximizing financial output. This integration of the WBI into the fabric of our economic system could transform the very essence of capitalism, steering it towards a more holistic, equitable, and sustainable future.

Unified Roadmap for the Well-Being Index (WBI) Development and Implementation

Phase 1: Foundation and Research

1. Research and Comparative Analysis: Conduct extensive research and comparative analysis of existing indices like the HDI, GNH, HPI, and SPI. This step is crucial for understanding the strengths and limitations of current metrics.

2. Indicator Selection and Weight Allocation: Form a multidisciplinary team to determine specific indicators for the WBI, incorporating insights from diverse fields. Conduct a global survey to guide the weight allocation of different indicators.

Phase 2: Prototype Development and Pilot Testing

1. Prototype Development: Develop a WBI prototype integrating selected indicators and utilizing advanced data analytics and visualization tools.

2. Pilot Testing: Implement tests in selected regions or communities to validate the WBI methodology, identify issues in data collection, and gather feedback.

Phase 3: Regulatory Compliance and Advocacy

1. Regulatory Framework Analysis: Analyze global and regional data protection regulations to ensure WBI's compliance with privacy and ethical standards.

2. Advocacy for Data Accessibility: Promote regulatory reforms to facilitate access to essential real-time data while respecting privacy and security.

Phase 4: Implementation and Scaling

1. Global Platform Launch: Launch the WBI as a global platform accessible to policymakers, researchers, and the public.

2. Collaborations and Partnerships: Establish partnerships for data sharing, funding, and implementation support.

3. Ongoing Data Collection and Analysis: Ensure continuous data collection and analysis to keep the WBI current and responsive.

Phase 5: Engagement, Outreach, and Iterative Improvement

1. Educational and Awareness Campaigns: Develop and disseminate educational materials, including explainer videos and online resources.

2. Gamification Strategies: Implement gamification elements to encourage public engagement and participation in improving well-being scores.

3. Feedback and Iterative Improvement: Establish feedback mechanisms for continuous refinement and adaptation of the WBI.

Phase 6: Long-Term Vision and Policy Integration

1. Integration into Policy and Decision-Making: Advocate for the use of WBI insights in local, national, and global policymaking.

2. Scaling and Diversification: Expand the WBI to cover a broader range of regions and communities, adapting it to local contexts.

3. Future-Focused SDGs Integration: The Well-Being Index (WBI) as a Real-Time Feedback Loop of future Sustainable Development Goals. This approach ensures both micro and macro-level scalability in measuring resilience and agility, allowing for swift adaptation and precise targeting in our sustainable development efforts. It's about making our global goals responsive, dynamic, and truly attuned to the changing needs of our world.

Phase 7: Enhancing Engagement through Live Data

1. Interactive WBI Platform: Develop an engaging WBI platform utilizing live data to reflect real-time socio-economic conditions at various levels.

2. Interactive Feedback Platforms: Create channels for dialogue, feedback, and collaborative development.

Phase 8: Regional Upliftment and Global Outreach

1. Regional Upliftment Initiatives: Design frameworks to assist and uplift surrounding communities, contributing to collective prosperity.

2. Global Outreach Campaign: Engage policymakers worldwide to build consensus on the WBI’s value and potential.

Integrating Game Theory into Societal Progress with the WBI

The WBI's alignment with several principles of Game Theory offers insightful perspectives on societal progress and cooperation:

1. Non-Zero-Sum Games: Unlike GDP's zero-sum game scenarios, the WBI promotes a non-zero-sum approach, suggesting mutual benefits when nations and communities focus on well-being rather than mere economic growth. This cooperative game model fosters scenarios where all can prosper together.

2. Iterated Games and Long-Term Cooperation: The WBI encourages nations to adopt a mindset of long-term cooperation and mutual support, akin to iterated game strategies in Game Theory. This approach favors collaboration over short-term gains, aligning with sustainable societal health.

3. Incentive Structures and Strategic Decision-Making: The WBI influences strategic choices by creating incentive structures that reward actions leading to societal well-being. This parallels Game Theory's emphasis on selecting strategies based on expected payoffs.

4. Nash Equilibrium in Societal Well-Being: The WBI encourages a state akin to the Nash Equilibrium, where optimizing well-being doesn't come at others' expense, suggesting a balanced and optimal state of global societal health.

5. Public Goods Game and Collective Action: In the context of the WBI, enhancing societal well-being is a public good. It promotes a collective action model, emphasizing the importance of cooperation in the provision and maintenance of societal well-being.

Conclusion: Embarking on a Transformative Quest with the WBI

As we reflect on the state of our world, it's evident that global affairs are not on an optimistic trajectory, signaling a pressing need for change. Recognizing this, the WBI represents a profound shift in our approach to measuring societal progress, transcending traditional economic metrics to embrace a more comprehensive view of human and planetary health.

This journey, while sparked by individual inspiration, thrives on collective wisdom and collaboration. The WBI, in its essence, is a call to action for all who envision a future where societal advancement is in harmony with the well-being of our planet and its people. It is about creating a balanced, equitable, and thriving world, where progress is gauged by the richness of human and environmental health, not just economic growth.

Join me in this exciting endeavor. Share your perspectives, join the dialogue, and help transform this vision into a tangible reality. Together, let's chart a course towards a future where our measures of progress truly resonate with what matters most – the health and well-being of our world and its inhabitants.

WBI White Paper

124KB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download the full WBI white paper

Download

Just as geological tectonic plates clash at the edges—the limes, the boundaries—so too does Ukraine, situated on the cusp of US allies in this region, while Russia challenges American supremacy.

Ukraine, with far fewer population and resources compared to Russia, will need about $42 billion in economic assistance in 2024 to compensate for its looming budget deficit, merely to sustain basic public services and avert chaos.

Unfortunately, the trajectory for Ukraine does not look optimistic. Without substantial support—advanced weaponry, technology, and funding—Ukraine's chances of survival are waning along with its economy.

Game-changing strategies that bring additional stakeholders to invest in Ukraine's survival are urgently needed.

Paul Romer, a Nobel Prize laureate and ex-Chief Economist at the World Bank, unveiled an idea in 2009 which could offer a surprise move to bring more players to have a skin in the game on Ukrainian soil: ‘charter cities.’ Unlike special economic zones, these are not mere pockets of economic exemption, but rather substantial areas functioning as autonomous, self-governing regions within a country’s borders, fully respecting the sovereignty of the host nation, operating in a collaborative model that involves both the host country and international partners, primarily through public-private partnerships rather than direct foreign administration. Their creation wouldn’t just carve out a new economic landscape; it would also lay down a separate, autonomous legal infrastructure, distinct from that of the host nation. This innovative concept could potentially transform parts of Ukraine into globally governed hubs, potentially attracting international stakeholders to invest in its stability and prosperity.

Incentivizing global investment into a Ukrainian-International charter city could pivot on the promise of regulatory agility and pioneering governance that allows for rapid innovation. With the groundwork laid by Paul Romer's concept, this new zone could feasibly operate as a sandbox for cutting-edge development in multiple sectors.

One of the most compelling incentives might be the establishment of an expedited regulatory framework for medical research and pharmaceutical development, echoing the agility of Próspera in Honduras with its accelerated access to gene editing technologies. This could attract American biotech firms seeking freedom from the protracted approval processes of the FDA, as well as Chinese companies looking to bypass stringent national drug policies.

The charter city could also pioneer therapies that are on the cusp of broader acceptance. For example, psychedelics and empathogenics, gaining traction in scientific circles for their therapeutic potential, could be legalized for controlled use. Such a move could not only aid in addressing the trauma of Ukrainians affected by war but also draw investment and medical tourism from nations like China, where such therapies will not be available.

Financial technology is another realm ripe for transformation. The charter city could embrace blockchain and decentralized finance (DeFi) to create a sophisticated digital securities market within a modernized legal framework. This deregulated environment would be a magnet for fintech firms constrained by the existing financial systems.

On the digital frontier, business incorporation could be as streamlined as it is in Dubai, which has successfully attracted global businesses by adopting a legal framework modeled on the UK's. A Ukrainian charter city could implement the most favorable regulations, fostering an environment where digital businesses can flourish.

Given Ukraine's current trajectory toward digitalization, with rapid implementation of digital civil services, military innovation, and education, a charter city could become a hotbed for technological advancement. This would not only provide a fast track for Ukrainian development but also create a blueprint for modern urban planning and international investment, potentially leading to a significant stake for diverse global players in the country's future.

The concept of international charter cities in Ukraine necessitates a novel formula for cooperation and investment. This model could take the form of a joint venture, where investors are offered shares and long-term leases, benefiting from lower taxation and extensive regulatory freedom. Such a venture could span various sectors, including drug development, finance, and production, operating within a spectrum of regulatory liberty akin to a corporate enterprise. This approach not only incentivizes investment but also fosters an environment conducive to innovation and development. By offering a unique blend of governance, legal autonomy, and economic incentives, these charter cities can become beacons of progress, attracting a diverse range of global stakeholders who are vested in the stability and prosperity of Ukraine.

A critical aspect of these international charter cities is their approach to migration. To streamline the integration of international talent and investment, a clear and efficient visa application process with the Ukrainian government is imperative. This process could include a quota system to manage the influx of individuals and ensure a balanced demographic mix. The visa policy should be designed to attract skilled professionals, entrepreneurs, and investors while maintaining security and cultural integrity. By establishing a well-defined and welcoming migration framework, these charter cities can become melting pots of global talent and innovation, contributing significantly to the economic and social fabric of Ukraine.

The prospect of establishing charter cities in Ukraine could present an intriguing opportunity for Chinese investment, particularly in the automobile industry. As the world's leading producer of electric cars, Chinese manufacturers are constantly exploring avenues to position their factories advantageously close to the European Union's vast market. While such a strategic move might be implausible under a scenario dominated by American oversight, the shared governance model of a charter city offers a unique solution. In a multi-stakeholder environment, where ownership and oversight are distributed among various international players, Chinese companies could gain a foothold in Europe's backyard. This could be particularly attractive if the charter city’s regulatory regime is designed to be conducive to manufacturing and trade, potentially easing typical barriers and making it an attractive prospect for Chinese interests seeking to expand their global footprint.

The concept of charter cities, while ambitious, is far from mere fantasy. Real-world precedents such as Próspera in Honduras are already showcasing the potential of such initiatives, moving from theory to practice. Additional projects like Praxis and Itana, although still in development, signal a growing interest and belief in the viability of this model. Further legitimizing this strategic approach are investment entities like Pronomos Capital, which are actively allocating resources and capital to nurture the growth of charter cities. These developments suggest that the strategy of creating semi-autonomous urban areas, designed to foster innovation and economic growth, is gaining traction.

By embracing the charter city model, Ukraine could strategically position itself as a new 'pole' in the current global landscape, marked by geopolitical tensions and the competing interests of major powers. By leasing land for these semi-autonomous cities and offering a favorable tax regime to businesses setting up there, Ukraine could create a lucrative revenue stream independent of the larger military-industrial narratives driven by Russia and the US. This approach would not only diversify its economy but also create a unique value proposition for global business communities that may not fully align with the dominant geopolitical forces. In effect, Ukraine could introduce a new attractive force in the international magnetic field, pulling in diverse investments and establishing itself as a neutral, innovative hub in the midst of a multipolar world clash. This could redefine the country's role on the world stage, making it a pivotal player in the reshaping of global economic dynamics.

In the intricate tapestry of international relations, the role of stakeholders like China, and specifically the influence of its leader, Xi Jinping, could be pivotal in shaping Ukraine’s future. As Ukraine explores novel economic frontiers through charter cities, attracting Chinese investment could be a strategic masterstroke, weaving Chinese interests into the Ukrainian economic fabric. This interlacing, however, wouldn’t be exclusive to China. By engaging a consortium of international investors—European, Middle Eastern, American, Asian or maybe even African—the stakes for global peace and economic stability in Ukraine would become a shared international concern. In such a scenario, leaders like Xi Jinping would find themselves part of a broader coalition of invested parties, each with a significant role in safeguarding their interests in the region. This collective investment could create a powerful deterrent to further conflict, making the cost of aggression too high for any single player to bear. By fostering this intricate network of interdependencies, Ukraine could champion a new paradigm in conflict resolution, leveraging economic integration as a bulwark against further destruction.

A New Paradigm in Geopolitical Dynamics

In essence, the establishment of international charter cities in Ukraine could herald a new paradigm in geopolitical dynamics, where economic interdependence fosters stability and peace. These cities, with their innovative approaches to governance, investment, and cultural integration, could become pivotal in reshaping Ukraine's role on the global stage. As they grow and thrive, they will not only bolster Ukraine's economy but also contribute to a more interconnected and harmonious world order. This vision of Ukraine, transformed into a mosaic of thriving international hubs, offers a glimpse into a future where cooperation and progress triumph over conflict and division, setting a precedent for generations to come.

As Ukraine embarks on this ambitious journey, it is crucial to clarify that the concept of charter cities, as proposed here, respects the sovereign integrity of the nation. These cities are envisioned as partnerships that blend the strengths of public governance and private enterprise, fostering innovation and development while maintaining the cultural and legal fabric of Ukraine. By adopting this model, which contrasts with the traditional notion of foreign-administered city-states, Ukraine can create a dynamic economic landscape that leverages global expertise and investment, without compromising its national sovereignty. This approach not only aligns with contemporary global practices but also ensures that the charter cities are integrated harmoniously into Ukraine's broader economic and social framework, contributing to its resilience and prosperity in a complex global arena.

Subscribe now

TL;DR - the essence of the message:

In a world driven by the AI revolution, finding alignment between humans and artificial intelligence is a pressing challenge. But here's a thought-provoking twist: Perhaps the key to unlocking this alignment lies in finding harmony among humanity first. Without a united front, how can we expect to bridge the gap with AI?

Enter the concept of a Well-Being Index (WBI), a potential solution that could guide us towards alignment as a global society.

Imagine a world where our collective well-being takes center stage, where metrics like home prices, unemployment rates, air quality, mental health, and green spaces shape our decision-making process. This holistic approach, calculable in real-time using digital tools, could revolutionize the way we evaluate and steer our progress. Say goodbye to the sole focus on GDP growth and embrace a transparent, people-centric approach through the power of the WBI.

But how do we get there? We need a roadmap that navigates us towards AI-based governance, ensuring reliability and alignment every step of the way.

The following text is exclusively written by Max Kusmierek without AI assistance—subscribe for free to receive more captivating Greetings from the Future.

Introduction

The AI revolution is in full swing, and every week hundreds of new tools are introduced. Unfortunately, many of us are still unaware of what is going on and how many jobs will be affected sooner than we think. I would like to stimulate the discussion of how to mindfully deploy those technologies in a beneficial way for the public sector.

One of the main needs I see is to establish a North Star to drive us in an aligned direction.

The Case for AI-Based Governance

• AI systems maximize the efficiency of the friction cost. The number of factors and data used for the process is beyond human capacity.

• Can’t corrupt open-source transparent systems.

• Even in a direct democracy, society can’t cope with the number of decisions and might not be informed and educated enough to analyze all the nuances and make decisions

Of course, we need to develop a gradual roadmap for the rollout of AI-based governance. As we still need to improve the alignment and reliability of machine learning-based systems, it’s time to establish frameworks for their implementation.

The Roadmap for AI-Based Governance

The first stage "analysis, advice, and recommendation" (AAR), will be akin to a technological brainstorming session. During this stage, AI will suggest solutions and legislation, which will then be subject to a vote in parliament or a referendum. Of course, for this to work effectively, we need to nurture the system with data - a process that's already well underway.

The North Star for AI-Based Governance

The North Star: We need a clear direction for our AI systems to effect meaningful change and achieve alignment. To set this direction for everyone, it's crucial that we engage in constructive debate. Currently, our main KPI is gross domestic product (GDP), and we are constantly trying to achieve its growth while being limited by the finite resources of the planet.

I would suggest evaluating something in the form of a Well-Being Index as a North Star.

The WBI can include elements such as:

• home prices per square meter/average wage,

• unemployment rate,

• air quality,

• percentage of the population with depression (mental health issues),

• and the amount of green space per inhabitant.
  

With modern digital tools, this can be calculated live on a municipality,  district, country, or region scale and used to evaluate each decision. The transparent approach could also make more people actively participate in WBI contributions; as for the GDP, not so many people actually care about it.

Once we set up the global direction to thrive, we can move forward.

AI-Based Governance in Practice

Large Language Models (LLMs) can propose legislative changes to simplify the law - this is the low-hanging fruit. For instance, in the European Union, every country has a Value-Added Tax (VAT) implementation that differs not only in rates but also in approach and exemptions. I truly believe we are capable of unifying VAT tax regulations in the EU "overnight," which lowers the operation cost for many companies.

Adopting AI co-governance can make politicians more efficient, leading to better development for countries, as the current approach is sub-optimal.

The feasible holy grail could be an AI-based tax system. Hopefully, due to multiple sources of live data, the new methods of automatic taxation can work out. This can lead to completely new methods of financing the budget and maybe a new economy. There is a chance that the optimal tax for maintaining a good Well-Being index is based on actual natural resource use and environmental costs.

Almost sci-fi from yesterday's perspective can be an idea for avatar-like personal representatives, like an individual bot congressman/senator/member of parliament in the democratic process. This app will learn your preferences, patterns, and life goals and vote on your behalf in the direct democratic process, aligned with the North Star consensus.

Vox populi can be heard as never before.

(I was inspired by a similar idea in a TED talk by César Hidalgo)

Safety Considerations for AI-Based Governance

This can develop faster than we think, so now is the time to set the framework for AI. As a part of the safety implementation approach, discussion is necessary. Maybe we should set hard lines for what decisions automatic systems can't make. For example, preventing decisions about death or forbidding people to meet.

Also, regulations might need to cover the datasets that are nurturing the models. For public use, large language models should have transparent sourcing, maybe sealed with blockchain.

We need to keep in mind that those systems should always serve us, not the other way around.

By correctly implementing them, we can achieve the next level of development for our civilization. True evolution.

Conclusion and Next Steps

In my view, public LLMs should work on legal and tax system research while we discuss what our North Star is and start measuring it ASAP.

Subscribe and stay tuned for more Greetings from the Future by Max Kuśmierek (@MaxKusmierek).

Subscribe now